Sharr_Dextera

I deeply apologized for triggering such commotion. As responsibility for indulged myself on those kind of "stupidity", I will not post any comments after this one in the future. And you should feels free to report my previous comments as Inappropriate or any other reason that you feel fit. Thanks.

Actually, matters about technological advantages or disadvantages between those countries are not my concern in this thread. It's also possible to develop into a long debate, but not at this thread. Still, my point is, why keep calling those Carriers as a Destroyer. You can call it light carrier, or helicopter carrier, or defense carrier, or destroyer-like-carrier, or Chibi carrier, or Kokuubo (just like koinu or koneko). I know there is a rule that forbid Japanese Navy to own or built a ship larger than Destroyer. But they just built it (aircraft carrier) after all. And then they just keep calling it a destroyer. Its just like you got a full size bus, but keep telling people "oh that just a minivan" But, if they want to redefine a new classification on naval warships, then fine. We just called every aircraft carrier afloat a Destroyer now....

It doesn't take decade for the PLAN. https://www.janes.com/article/81249/image-emerges-showing-possible-design-of-china-s-third-aircraft-carrier?utm_campaign=PC6110_E18 DF NL Naval 26_06_18&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Eloqua 2015... 2016...

Sometime in the future we might be hear this... "I name this ship HMS... Brexit... To remind us the darkest hour for our country in this century. May God bless her and all who sail in her while she carrying her duties to protect our (remaining) sovereignty" Just a joke, no pressure...

I do really know and understand about JMSDF strength and their influence in circum pacific navies. I subsribe and read many military journal such as Jane's and Key Publishing magz. The point of my first post in this thread are, Why they keep calling those DDH "Destroyer" when actually it had capability or can be upgrade or convert into fully operational carriers. They should stand proud and say to the world "Yes we have carrier now". I do respect from my bottom heart what kind of warships that japanese people can made. Afterall, they are the first nation in Asia that capable to built their own Battleships and Aircraft Carriers. Thats why I said that in the manner of sarcasm.

A little bit OOT... But IMO, judging by the change of situation on that region recently, they should make an amandement to Article 9. Especially when one of your neighbours planned to add more carriers in the future, and acting "a little bit agressive" more oftenly. Also, one of your allies sometimes disagree with your policy or your actions. Pacifism doesn't resolve anything if you are the weak one. And you can't always rely on your strongest ally without any compromise.

Just like John Warner...

Then... how about this... Named after battleship (and become hybrid battleship-carrier later), they called it a destroyer(ish), but actually it (can be converted into) is an aircraft carrier?. They should named it Hiryuu, Souryuu, Shokaku or Zuikaku... Same things happen to DDH-183 Izumo and DDH-184 Kaga. But Kaga's name still acceptable (maybe) because it's converted from BB hull into CV.

Lost excitement to the game too, for now. Usually, once had I return from offshore works, I've spend most my of gaming time on WoWs. Last time I step on drylands, I bought 2 premium ships, containers, premium times, special camouflages, and restock the economic flags. Prepare to grind on operations, and participate at any events occur at the time. But thats not happen at this time. Too many factors such as CV rework (and any stuff that following the issue), uncertainty about AA system, uncertainty about premium ships. I'm have prepared for the Irian, but it cost too much and too uncertain (for now). I'm waiting for RN CV, but it comes with CV rework system. Yes I have tried new CV, they invited me on those special test, and PTS too. But I dont like it simply because it's not my preferable playstyle. The news about changing premium ships in the future just like an enigma too. I don't know it will be buffed, nerfed, uptiered, downtiered, or else, but when they messing up something that you've paid with your own money, thats not okay for me. Especially with the premium ships that already in my port. WG maybe have the rights to think that they need something new to attract new player, selling (new or buffed) item on market, or do whatever they want. It's their game/product, so que sera sera. And I have no rights (or a chance) to do anything about that. For now I've cut down my time (a lot) on WoWs, and goes back to EVE online and DCS world (back to my beloved MiGs). But I still read this forum to monitor the progress on WoWs realm

That seems... logical. And there will be a DD rework... follow by BB rework... and then CL rework... continues to CA rework. And then we will get CV rework 2.0. And then followed again by.... Oh, wait... there should be a submarine somewhere.... And dont't forget to add the LST class. So our mates from WOT can join our battle

Scrub are scrub, whatever they do, wherever they go...

I'm totaly agreed with your opinion.

Yeah, I agreed to that...

So, What if... They gonna take tier 5 premium Giulio from its owner (for any reason), give them doubloons compensation. And then put back Giulio to market as tier 6 premium, add an extra cost, and hope that previous Giulio owner buy her back with tier 6 premium price?? Pardon me, but can I think that is a Scam???

Que sera sera, WG... Time will tell. I just watch (or enjoy?)