Jump to content

Grygus_Triss

Member
  • Content Сount

    1,913
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    10342
  • Clan

    [CLAY]

Community Reputation

1,262 Illustrious

3 Followers

About Grygus_Triss

  • Rank
    Rear Admiral
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Lost in the fog of my own mind

Recent Profile Visitors

1,478 profile views
  1. Grygus_Triss

    . . . why !!! BECAUSE

    While I agree with the sentiment, at this point it’s a bit like talking to a brick wall, WG just aren’t listening, so it’s easy to laugh at the fruitlessness of it. I also feel that WG don’t listen much to comments in the english section of the Asia forums, we seem to be too small to notice.
  2. Well, the new players have to lean about Russian Bias at some point lol.
  3. Grygus_Triss

    This is WOW Asia

    Take into account, it’s also the weekend. Get lots of casuals on weekend.
  4. Grygus_Triss

    This is WOW Asia

    I think you mean, "This is WoWS Asia". WoW is reserved for World or Warcraft. Sorry, being pedantic. As far as your problem. Just try again. Its common for team mates to NOT recognise that there's a radar ship in area, or a DD which can outgun you, or German Hydro about, or aircraft constantly flying overhead, i.e a bunch of DD counters. My method is to ping the map in the area of the threat and hit F5, or F3 on the offending ship , or F... whatever the AA support one is, and hope the team get the message that I can't do it alone. Sometimes in a DD, the best you can do without getting killed is light up ships for allies to shoot, DDs are not supposed to be one man navys. It that doesn't work, find some other way to get XP before the inevitable loss, and hope you get a better team next time. Or try to do what they say, and get killed because you get radared and gunned down because that what happens when you're not supported.
  5. That sounds good. Why can’t we have stuff like this for Halloween and April fools and whatever holiday the savage battles were celebrating? Ya think they will implement the long suggested “age of sails” this year, or, far more likely, more space battles?
  6. @NHLWXY Well, the idea sounds ok. Fortunately @Max_Battle is around to bring me to my senses. We need ops based on historical battles first. Not to mention all existing ops fixed, released, and made available to all nations. Then we can talk about alternate game modes. Seriously, WG needs to cater to history buffs more and high tier PvPers less.
  7. Just grab the most recently released Russian ship. Almost a guarantee that any newly released Soviet ship will be overpowered in Clan Battles.
  8. Grygus_Triss

    People you've encountered in-game

    Just saw @Dread_Pirate_BlackHeart in a match, sailing Brindisi.
  9. Grygus_Triss

    Did I make a mistake getting the Baltimore?

    I remember grinding Baltimore back when it was T9, and before radar nerf. My strategy was go full speed to island near a cap and pop radar if enemy DD tried to cap, lighting it up for team to shoot at. Do not do this. As others have said, find an island and lob shells over. Use bow on against ships which can't overmatch you, and remember the power of your AP shells. You are not a HE spammer. As with most radar ships, you become stronger the longer you survive, just hope you have CV or DD support to spot for you.
  10. Grygus_Triss

    The Armoury???

    I've been having the same issue with armory. I'm hoping it fixes itself after a while. And WG uses US spelling because US has biggest English speaking influence.
  11. Grygus_Triss

    Please Wargaming; do it slow, one at a time...

    The other big issue is that every new line has to have some gimmick, and WG are running out of ideas for gimmicks.
  12. Grygus_Triss

    Free Flag ?

    "You may even find yourself dealing with an unexpected flood below your armor belt!" I really didn't expect WG to start writing warship erotica...
  13. Grygus_Triss

    Please Wargaming; do it slow, one at a time...

    Well said. I personally think WG is pushing new content, especially ship lines, too fast. And you're right, all these balance changes on top of new lines and matchmaking changes could mess it all up. Ignoring the burn out it gives to the players. I think 4 new lines a year is too much, give newer/time poor players a chance to play all the other lines. If they want new content, they should try spending some time on something other than new ships or PvP, like Operations. Honestly, I feel that in the past year or so WG has gotton a new manager that just said "all the stuff we were focusing on, forget it, this is what we're doing, 4 new ship lines a year, more PvP, T9 & 10 premiums, more events designed to suck money out of customers. That's how game companies make profits. Forget stuff like operations and game balance, that doesn't make much money." The truth, the almighty "spreadsheet" that WG uses to make decisions, is actually a profit spreadsheet which shows what does and doesn't make money. … S4pp3R, your videos really increase my cynicism, you know that?
  14. Grygus_Triss

    What happened to the money spent on Puetro Rico

    I have not failed... I have SUCCEEDED in not spending money on an overpriced piece of ship and giving into WGs horrible tactics.
  15. Grygus_Triss

    What happened to the money spent on Puetro Rico

    You at least got the rewards for meeting certain point requirements. That’s your reward if you didn’t want to pay for Paytorico. Its annoying, but that’s what what WG wanted! Exploit the sunken cost fallacy. But you were smarter, you didn’t fall for it, you saved your money. Well done, buy something that’s worth it. I’ve heard that the Puerto Rico at T10 isn’t as good as the Alaska at T9 anyway.
×