Jump to content

Grygus_Triss

Member
  • Content Сount

    3,545
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    15227
  • Clan

    [CLAY]

Community Reputation

2,964 Glorious

5 Followers

About Grygus_Triss

  • Rank
    Vice Admiral
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Lost in the fog of my own mind

Recent Profile Visitors

2,697 profile views
  1. Grygus_Triss

    I reach 50% WR, am i a good player ?

    And there will always be that team which will lose the game, no matter how hard you carry.
  2. Grygus_Triss

    There are too many destroyers in the co-op battles

    Be together in a 3 man division? Granted, if a bunch of people not in divs hit battle at the same time, there is a chance they’ll end up in the same battle anyway, but the easier option is the 3 man div as you will be ensured that your 2 DD div mates will spawn close to you so even if there are other DDs in the battle, they’ll be further away, giving you the chance to farm. Of course, this assumes your friends are willing to sacrifice their credits and time.
  3. Grygus_Triss

    There are too many destroyers in the co-op battles

    Cheat the system. Get two friends in DDs to come with you and leave the kills for you.
  4. Grygus_Triss

    There are too many destroyers in the co-op battles

    True, they won’t do anything. But It’s better than attacking innocent players.
  5. Grygus_Triss

    Fair winds, friends.

    Good luck.
  6. Grygus_Triss

    There are too many destroyers in the co-op battles

    You’re blaming the wrong people. You need to report the designers of the ship, not the players. Just because other people report these ships does not make it right. At the end of the day, you are still reporting people for playing their ships well. Complain to WG that these ships are too effective.
  7. Grygus_Triss

    There are too many destroyers in the co-op battles

    You report people for playing the ship and the game in the most effective way? Do you also report allied BB for shooting at broadsiding ships?
  8. Grygus_Triss

    There are too many destroyers in the co-op battles

    Yeah. I’m guilty of this. Every time I have a mission which needs torpedo hits, damage, kills etc… I’ll jump in a DD and grind co-op and use the tactic listed above. Of course, this is partially because any other ship type will not fare as well in farming because so many captains use these tactics… People get sick of DDs dominating, so they play DDs. Even I get annoyed when I’m in another ship (because mission requires restricted ship types) and DDs one shot kill things, but you know, I can’t get too mad because I’d do the same thing. I have noticed more fast DDs, like the French, recently. I don’t have any high tier French DDs, so I notice when they’re steaming past by Benham. Only time I don’t play like that in a DD is when I’m farming caps, or farming main battery hits in Harugumo or Kitakaze, in which I’ll deliberately avoid using torps in order to farm more hits. That said, I’ve also found that certain big gun ships can knock off the HP of my targets before I even reach them, but that’s fair I guess. Overall, it’s a symptom of the game, and the captains who use these tactics should not be blamed, they use what is best to achieve their goals. People use these tactics in Co-Op because they it’s easier to farm things quickly. If there were other methods, they’d use them. What bugs me is that co-op is flooded with DDs while random is sparse. This is because random, especially high tier, is not a good place for DDs. To be honest, while I primarily only use Co-Op for completing missions, I have found it easier to grind high tier DDs in co-op than random… And you generally have to kill half the enemy ships in order to break even. In co-op, it’s every captain for themselves, that’s unfortunately the way things are. If there was an easier way to farm, especially missions, people would. I don’t think it justifies people reporting me for playing well…
  9. Grygus_Triss

    Dear Wargaming

    Seconded. Maybe skip a ship line or two and work on some Quality of Life for the servers.
  10. Grygus_Triss

    6th Anniversary code master list

    Thankyou. 4th Code says invalid format. Cheers
  11. Grygus_Triss

    Australian Navy inspired by Wargaming

    What I always find funny is that Solar, Hydro, Wind, is all technically reliant on the Sun. Sun is the power behind the weather. And they are technically not renewable. Sun will eventually burn out, but that’s so far in the future so as to be practically unlimited. And come to that, the Sun is technically a Nuclear Fusion reactor. WE’VE BEEN USING NUCLEAR POWER ALL ALONG! What I find funny, everyone is arcing up about breaking the NPT. That only applies to weapons. The NPT actually has “promotion of peaceful use of nuclear energy” as its third pillar. I think people really do forget that. Of course, I don’t know if being a power source for a submarine is considered a “weapon”. The Wikipedia article seems to mention mainly bombs and explosives.
  12. Was he DC for entire game and just logged in and started up when you lost? (that has happened to me once or twice... stupid internet...)
  13. Grygus_Triss

    Australian Navy inspired by Wargaming

    Now, I don't really pay too much attention, but what is the big problem with nuclear power? I'm somewhat aware that nuclear power isn't as bad as people make it out to be, but I really don't know. I know that nuclear weapons are bad, for obvious reasons. I know the waste from nuclear power needs to be handled carefully and stored for centuries somewhere in an underground facility. I know that nuclear restores have a bad rap due to Chernobyl and co, but aren't there heaps of nuclear power plants operating worldwide with no problems whatsoever? Is it an overreaction and misunderstanding? Granted, I think as far as civil power generation, renewables are the way to go, but we drag our heels so long with coal fired that nuclear could give us more time to develop better technologies. And this whole thing about Scott Morrison saying that we're not breaking the non nuclear proliferation policy... isn't that only for weapons, not power? But I generally agree with Sapper. The big thing Australia wanted for its subs was operating range (and to be built by Australia, but I think that was just political stupidity). Nuclear was always the better option for what we needed, we just had this attitude that nuclear was bad.
  14. Grygus_Triss

    What Heresy is this WG?

    Fun fact. I used to own a Saipan. To date it’s my most questionable knee jerk ship purchase back when I was getting into CVs (RTS, so maybe 4 to 5 years ago)and wanted a higher tier ship. I got it refunded for doubloons after the CV rework, bought a Sharnhorst with the money, and never looked back. I have no intention to ever buy a Saipan again. …. Saipan. More like Byepan.
  15. Grygus_Triss

    Australian Navy inspired by Wargaming

    Nah Nah, scary as they are, they’re only really good on land. We though we could use that to defeat them, but unfortunately they recruited the platypus to their side. Sailors say there is Nothing more terrifying than being on a ship surrounded by water in the dark, and hearing a wet slapping as the mutants crawl on deck…
×