I look for what community think about USS Carrier. To me, its relatively weak, why? 1. Only stock flight control is useful (most situation) which mean USS will always have less plane in air.
2. Unfair service time (example : 38 seconds for USS, 16 seconds IJN for reloading) & for replacing wiped squadron (IJN somewhere 30, and USS above 70 seconds!) even though the squad size difference only 2 planes! 3. Huge average damage difference, IJN always win.
Here what i think to match number of aircraft in air againts IJN Bogue : AS (2FT 1DB) S (1FT 1TB 1DB)
Independece: AS (2FT 1TB 1DB) S (1FT 1TB 2DB)
Ranger : AS (2FT 1TB 1DB) S (1FT 1TB 2DB) *Can't tell anymore from here, not played above Ranger yet :/
If you want know more what i think for higher tier: Lexington: AS (2FT 1TB 1DB) S (1FT 1TB 2DB)
Essex: AS (3FT 1TB 1DB) S (1FT 2TB 2DB)
Midway: AS (3FT 1TB 1DB) S (1FT 2TB 2DB)
So the main idea the USS always atleast 1 squadron of each type, without losing a single type, make upgrading flight control useful.
And make the service time only 50% higher than IJN, since it's 6 vs 4
Making 2 TB in S loadout for tier V-VIII is broken (except for Essex and Midway to match Taiho & Hakuryu S loadout), so putting 1DB is more balanced, thus in reality the US always prefer DB. (correct me if i am wrong)
Don't tell me to "git gud in USS!" , i know it but take a look at my stats, i am not pro but good enough as cv player
So what do you guys think, do USS need to be balance? (especially about flight control) Thank you