Watboy

10 mega from certificates, bought 20. Blyskawica, Lazo, Poltava, London, Rochester and 180days premium time. Not the 1% I was hoping for.

Well, now you can make DFAA useful. Have it make 100% of the damage go to attacking planes...

Its only a matter of time before they sell I-400 premium IJN subs with planes.

I finally tried some subs. I had decent games, I had bad games where i got demolished. I had skin in the game. Mistakes / poor play got me punished. That alone makes me like it more than CVs. Don't get me wrong, I hate the whole "WG will do it no matter what cuz we are the Borg..." inevitability, but the fact that you can die quickly, just like any other non-CV class, is a good thing.

Just had the worst MM in my 6 years of playing this game. It features 4 T8 CVs and 6 subs. So much fun being a bottom tier BB. WG not going to do anything about CV's and subs. But at least recognize that this sort of MM is no fun and bad for the game. I propose a very modest acknowledgement and waive service costs when such messed up MM occurs.

Sky cancer making it very difficult for me to get meaningful amounts of spotted ribbons in my DD. Can we at least add some Capture Ribbons or Damage Assist missions for Dockyard?

So I have today to farm 20mn potential damage for the French cruiser mission. What is better, bring out my tanky BBs (Preussen) or find the most hated ship in my dock (Puerto Rico? any other shell magnets?)

I know its sub optimal to go full secondary on these ships. But if I want to be optimal, I might as well play Georgia, Ohio, Thunderer. So I play my KG's full secondary.

Realism hasn't been a trait of the game for a long time, if ever. And its only getting worse with submarines going 20knots submerged firing warp speed homing corps.

36 super containers, no ships. But 100 detonation flags! 60 days premium, 2,000 doubloons, 1500 steel, bunch of flags and came.

Thanks for the clarification. Didn't realize it was that bad! They knew the shortlist was garbage so didn't disclose it. Its so clear to me now that Wargambling is choosing to not disclose loot tables because they know how bad they are, they are just using Chinese regulators as a weak excuse to not disclose.

the 2020 xmas crates where when I think they started the short list table, then all the drama and pressure for refunds ensued. I got a Kutuzov in 2019 xmas, but Makrov in 2020.

This was back when I could still... ahem.... farm detonation flags....

So I've been thinking why Wargambling won't disclose drop rates. They say due to China, but that isn't a regulatory issue as I understand WoWs doesn't have loot boxes there. The only logical reason I can think of us that China requires publication of drop rates, and if WarGambling is pressured to disclose drop rates in other markets, they might as well do so in such a way that would allow them to start selling loot boxes in China. I thus speculate that their current drop mechanism would not be allowed in China, and they need until next year to move to a drop rate system that is in compliance w Chinese regulations. It is a commercial business reason that they do not disclose now, not a Chinese regulatory one. How are they not in compliance? They use conditional drop rates, and China from I can gather, requires that you disclose definitive drop rates for every item, something WarGambling cannot do in its present state. Your odds of getting any desirable ship in last years xmas boxes was precisely zero if you didn't already have a Makarov. You had to meet a number of conditions first before you had a non-zero chance of getting the better ships. I bet you when they do finally disclose drop rates in 2022, it won't be anything like the drop rates of 2021.

I've never once gotten a ship. I did get 5,000 steel two SC's in a row though. Did they take steel out of the drop table? Worst I got was 50 detonation flags.