Paladinum

Schlieffen has better dispersion at max range compare to FdG and GK already - as far as dispersion at ~20 km is concerned. Sigma is still lower, however. Schlieffen: 217 m @ 20,1 km - 1,7 sigma FdG/GK's dispersion at 20,3 km is 267+ m with 1,8 sigma. Fuso with module FCS A is 226 m at 19,8 km with 1,5 sigma. Nagato FCS A: 232 m at 20,4 km with 2,0 sigma. Amagi: 228 m at 19,9 km with 1,8 sigma (probably the closest to Schlieffen yet ?) Izumo: 226 m at 19,7 km with 2,0 sigma. Kansas: 266 m at 20,6 km with 1,7 sigma. Lion: 268 m at 20,7 km with 1,8 sigma. Schlieffen seems to be more accurate than most of the BBs with the same range (19 - 21km). Now buff the line's rate of fire Decrease all reload time by 3 seconds flat on all ships

> "better accuracy than most battleships" > 1,6/1,7/1,8 sigma

Question about: the mission for 1000 token by reaching rank 1 in Gold League. The mission on the website says that it can be completed in either round, so if I reached Rank 1 in Gold League in Round 1, do I have to reach Rank 1 in Gold League in Round 2?

Napoli or Carnot? Will Carnot even be Coal? Or wil she be FXP? May I have both? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Not every ship needs to have ASW.

I might even consider her then. Who notices that her background in the selection screen is nighttime, with a full moon and all? What does that have to do with Naples? Why not a Neapolitan pizza?

Main gun range still less than Venezia?

BB player crying about BBs? Suck it up buttercup.

Very modern DDs (Swedish ones and Friesland) still don't have ASW rockets? This is how subs fail. No ASW rockets.

3) Whichever ships that I like to play. Which, unfortunately, there may be more "fantasy" ships than real ships in that list. Let's be real here, all ships in this game are fantasy Ships IRL don't have HP bars and unlimited number of shells/torps and activation-only radar, etc. etc. I don't think he meant that. His threads are usually for fun and no negative implication. AKA I know from precedents. Where is this coming from? Yourself? Any ship that was at least laid down should be in the "real" and not the "fantasy" category. Ships that existed only on papers IRL should be in the "fantasy" category... because they are fantasies for the navies that designed them

I hang German flags on most ships because Deutschland über alles.

> CAs have depth charges instead of ASW bombers. > ASW bombers have a minimum range to strike - they cannot drop as close as possible to the ship that uses it, similar to how torpedoes have an arming distance. > Very modern DDs like the Swedes and Friesland don't have ASW rockets despite having those on board, and Friesland was DESIGNED and MADE to fight subs first and foremost. The last point is one absolute failure of the sub implementation - something I consider to be as bad as placing Musashi as a T9 despite not being nerfed enough.

"AS Bogue is aft canker" 012 Bogue Ryuujo with 311 or 122 - awful to play against either way. 422 Hakuryu Midway had 136 planes. Saipan (T7) had T9 planes and was the pain in the aft of all other T7 CVs. Shokaku and Taihou (also Lexington?), tier for tier, were more popular choices than Hakuryu. The days when CVs aren't complete disgrace.

T2 Borodino looking at WG be like: