Jump to content

WarshipsToday

Member
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content Сount

    47

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

9 Neutral

See reputation activity

2 Followers

About WarshipsToday

  • Rank
    Lieutenant (junior grade)
  • Profile on the website WarshipsToday
  • Insignia

Recent Profile Visitors

157 profile views
  1. John_Ande started following WarshipsToday
  2. WarshipsToday

    Warships.Today - new statistics website [beta]

    WarshipsToday replied to WarshipsToday's topic in General Discussions

    I'm afirad I'm not sure what you mean.
  3. WarshipsToday

    Warships.Today - new statistics website [beta]

    WarshipsToday replied to WarshipsToday's topic in General Discussions

    New feature - statistics distribution (pseudo-)histogram charts now shown in vehicle page - with a reference point for the stats of the current user, if available. Feedback very welcome.
  4. WarshipsToday

    Warships.Today - new statistics website [beta]

    WarshipsToday replied to WarshipsToday's topic in General Discussions

    Previously the feedback from community was not to mix Ranked with PvP as the avg dmgs /etc. achieved are too different.
  5. WarshipsToday

    Warships.Today - new statistics website [beta]

    WarshipsToday replied to WarshipsToday's topic in General Discussions

    We improved it. Is it better now? Thanks.
  6. WarshipsToday

    Warships.Today - new statistics website [beta]

    WarshipsToday replied to WarshipsToday's topic in General Discussions

    This works for me as you can see in my signature.
  7. WarshipsToday

    Warships.Today - new statistics website [beta]

    WarshipsToday replied to WarshipsToday's topic in General Discussions

    What URL are you using? Do you know HTML/CSS. If yes, then I can explain how to come up with a better template and if it is good then we can incorporate it. If not then we have some plans to add more information, but not "improve the styling" as I thought it' s alright as it is.
  8. WarshipsToday

    Warships.Today - new statistics website [beta]

    WarshipsToday replied to WarshipsToday's topic in General Discussions

    Can you all please try again the signatures? Make sure you get new links from the website. We switched the domain to a .com and turned off https.
  9.    yobbo1972 reacted to a post in a topic: Warships.Today - new statistics website [beta]
  10.    R3negade reacted to a post in a topic: Warships.Today - new statistics website [beta]
  11. WarshipsToday

    Warships.Today - new statistics website [beta]

    WarshipsToday replied to WarshipsToday's topic in General Discussions

    There will be multiple versions of the signatures, but I'd first want forum admins to actually add it to the whitelist so that it can be used on the forums.
  12. WarshipsToday

    Warships.Today - new statistics website [beta]

    WarshipsToday replied to WarshipsToday's topic in General Discussions

    Thanks, I've done so.
  13. WarshipsToday

    Warships.Today - new statistics website [beta]

    WarshipsToday replied to WarshipsToday's topic in General Discussions

    Except I suspect forum admins need to add Warships.Today to a white-list before its signatures can be linked to.
  14. WarshipsToday

    Warships.Today - new statistics website [beta]

    WarshipsToday replied to WarshipsToday's topic in General Discussions

    Lots of requests for signatures so we prioritized them before other tasks. They are available from player profile page - for now just in "light" and "dark" varieties without further customization possibilities. Please let us know what you think and we can then decide where to take this further. P.S. Signatures are in "beta" - we didn't have time to do proper load tests so if we realize they kill the server we will take them off-line until we fix whatever the issue is.
  15. WarshipsToday

    Warships.Today - new statistics website [beta]

    WarshipsToday replied to WarshipsToday's topic in General Discussions

    I didn't get the impression they've actually done the math. All I see is the link to WN8 formula which we already know well and then an unsubstantiated claim. Let me try doing the math. The relevant portions are: rWIN = avgWinRate / expWinRate rWINc = max(0, (rWIN - 0.71) / (1 - 0.71) ) WN8 = ...snipped... + 145*MIN(1.8,rWINc) So assuming expWinRate = 0.5 then x1 = 0.51 vs x2 = 0.5 (for 1% difference) results in rWin1 = 0.51 / 0.5 = 1.02 rWin2 = 0.5 / 0.5 = 1 rWinc1 = (1.02 - 0.71) / (1 - 0.71) ~= 1.069 rWinc2 = (1 - 0.71) / (1 - 0.71) = 1 delta WN8 = (1.069 - 1)*145 = 10 So one percentage point WR changes WN8 (all else being equal) by 10 points. How does it look?
  16. WarshipsToday

    Warships.Today - new statistics website [beta]

    WarshipsToday replied to WarshipsToday's topic in General Discussions

    How do you get this 0.71 WN8 per 1% win? The WN8 formula is kind of complex & kind of random so I cannot say it's incorrect without doing some simulations (which I probably won't allocate time to do), but my gut feeling is that it's a lot higher.
  17. WarshipsToday

    Warships.Today - new statistics website [beta]

    WarshipsToday replied to WarshipsToday's topic in General Discussions

    Thanks, these are valid points. If majority of players do poorly in some ships, but the best players can achieve good results in the same ships, then the average will be low and it's easier to achieve a high WTR. That said, if WTR padding becomes prevalent then average stats go up and this self-regulates . We actually had an idea on how to fix it, but have way too much other work to do before we can put that into action.
  18. WarshipsToday

    Warships.Today - new statistics website [beta]

    WarshipsToday replied to WarshipsToday's topic in General Discussions

    Interesting discussion, apologies if I missed any questions. If someone thinks WTR is easily padded, please show specific examples of players doing that. It's hard to address abstract criticism which may or may not be true. It would also be great if you had specific suggestions in how to adjust it. Preferably, also have a good understanding on how it currently works. If you have questions about the last part, please ask them.
×