-
Content Сount
2,122 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
16785 -
Clan
[OAKUM]
Community Reputation
1,017 IllustriousAbout Ordrazz
-
Rank
Vice Admiral
- Birthday 01/27/1973
- Profile on the website Ordrazz
-
Insignia
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Southern Victoria, Australia
-
& a Happy new year to all, from all of us at Clan Oakum !!!!!! Ordrazz
-
I thought they changed the game a while ago to no longer recognise the res_mods folder anymore? I seem to rembemer reading in patch notes somewhere on the forums here.. As a result, i havent been using ship skins for a while.... Ordrazz
-
I like them... Adds randomness to the match... Otherwise it would be boring... I just wish we had heavy seas & big waves as well... Ordrazz
-
I thought you would've learnt not to show broadside by now ?? Anyway, everyone just fires HE nowadays & spams it non-stop, so really it should be the BB players (like me) complaining about that.... (Wait, perhaps I did, in an ancient thread ) DDs & CVs are the real problems, lets ban & remove them instead... Ordrazz
-
You are forgetting the consequences of that action.... If you uptier the ships you mention, then almost always , they will get double uptiered in matches because of bullshit MM rules, which ALWAYS screws people by putting them +2 tiered games,... Be ok for unicums or cheaters using cheats, but no good for normal nub people like me.... It would make GC end up in T8 games, scharnhorst at T10 games etc.... There's already enough of that uptiering shit going on now... Ordrazz
-
You are forgetting the consequences of that action.... If you uptier the ships you mention, then almost always , they will get double uptiered in matches because of bullshit MM rules, which ALWAYS screws people by putting them +2 tiered games,... Be ok for unicums or cheaters using cheats, but no good for normal nub people like me.... It would make GC end up in T8 games, scharnhorst at T10 games etc.... There's already enough of that uptiering shit going on now... Ordrazz
-
Ordrazz started following Belfast 43 performance is excessively low
-
Belfast 43 performance is excessively low
Ordrazz replied to 1366851653's topic in General Discussions
I remember people whingeing about Belfast a couple of years ago wanting it nerfed... "ahh its OP OP OP !!!" "Too strong" "payfast" "cheat ship"... The nerf club wanted it nerfed, everybody whingeing.... Well, y'all got ya wish .. So shut up & Enjoy hahahahahah PS - No more whingeing Ordrazz -
Why did you have to screw around with an already working system??! Wargaming's motto: "if it ain't broke, fix it" Ordrazz
-
ST 0.9.9, changes to test ships (USN BB Nerfs and RN CL Buffs)
Ordrazz replied to S0und_Theif's topic in General Discussions
What would be the point of getting oaklahoma, with 40 second reload? That will be the biggest reload in the game... Seriously do these people play them before nerfing them? 34 seconds is bad enough, & we are talking about a ship thats between new york & arizona.... Do they even REALISE that T5 BBs mostly get UPTIERED to T7 games ?!?!? Wake up & get REAL, WG !!!!!!! @mademoisail tell WG to get real, & stop screwing up ships -
This is exactly why so many people left the game originally 5 years ago, & i also almost left.... Divs of them were killing the maps, because they would paralyze half of it, with solid torp walls.. If WG really wants everyone to burst blood vessels, & rage quit permenantly, then by all means bring kitakami back.... The CV rework did a good job at losing some of the player base, why not destroy it even more with kitakami returning??? Its a broken idea, let it stay in the rubbish bin, where it was put 5 years ago.... Ordrazz
-
They'll probably be crap like the Roma