Jump to content

legionary2099

Member
  • Content Сount

    2,308
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    18194
  • Clan

    [LNA]

Community Reputation

741 Celebrated

4 Followers

About legionary2099

  • Rank
    Vice Admiral
  • Birthday 01/12/1994
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    HCM City

Recent Profile Visitors

3,802 profile views
  1. legionary2099

    Consumable Cancel

    I think that that is too much leeway. Like it does not create holes for red team to exploit. We already have camp festa, the ability to remove what little error exploit we have will lead into even more campy situation. Think radar. IF radar ship get the ability to be on or off at will and pace out consumable reload, no gap will ever be created. This lead to 2 side looking at each other yet don't dare to do anything. Another better mechanic would be ship are allocated resources to spend on consumable. You can spend them as situation dictate, but it will eat away the limited resource you have, which lead you to not be able to use the resource when needed. So you can use DFAA or hydro search/ heal, ... etc at will. But will be limited by maximum usage. So you need to think carefully about preserving, but is not limited on tactical use. Only on strategic uses. So for example : you get 9 resources. you can spend 3 on radar , 1 on hydro , ... etc .
  2. legionary2099

    25% debuff for selected Ops thoughts

    Those services are still around if you know where to look. They don't bot nowadays. Just relying on sheer skill of the service provider to do mission and grind resources. The more controversial stuffs lies in playing clan war to get the Chieftain , and it's usually not the account owner playing ...
  3. legionary2099

    25% debuff for selected Ops thoughts

    Where's the eagle on top though ? Not in the chicken i hope.
  4. legionary2099

    These 2 operations are too difficult!

    Hint : it is much easier if you do it with friends instead of random bros. I have rarely lost any operation matches. Just play with a 3 man division and it should work. You are only royally screwed if you pick truly awful ship like Cherbourg or ship with no AA in ops with a ton of planes (Hermes looking at you).
  5. legionary2099

    25% debuff for selected Ops thoughts

    And most of the time i find them YOLOing carrier or sniping from torpedo max range. Suprising may be the most rewarding and right way to play. But it doesn't stop it from sonar torpedoing from 10km away with almost no retaliation cause it only got 6km detect range. It only come into line when CV fly around and spot them. Like i said, the problem is , this class features allow no skill point n click if the player so chooses.
  6. legionary2099

    25% debuff for selected Ops thoughts

    Well I agreed, but hey they found a new way to do it. And they will do it. Unless we wack them into doing a reasonable version of that.
  7. legionary2099

    25% debuff for selected Ops thoughts

    It isn't , the tech that come with it is valuable. And sub do cater to the part of people who want a ship that can sit and snipe all they want. Not the healthiest for the game , but there is demand for that. Like chilling when playing artillery in WoT. It is a low skill low ceiling ship type and people hate it, but it is a choice for people with practically no interest in improving their play. And that still make a big portion of the playerbase. I would not be suprised if some premium submarine come out and suddenly it become best sellers thanks to ease of use. Submarine right now have practically no skill requirement.
  8. legionary2099

    25% debuff for selected Ops thoughts

    Not the most unfavorable to player, but the most favorable to it's interest and it's best paying customers. Bad press do bring changes, as with the LWM debacles that force a lot of high ranking WG workers to come out. It is a company , like it or not.
  9. legionary2099

    25% debuff for selected Ops thoughts

    It is a state of intention. We vote with our wallet. Clearly the people with wallet speak momentum to how this game go by the years. People who pay the most are not usually people who play the best. But who pay WG ? Ofc it is the people who pay the best. Then again, if you never speak nobody will ever know what you want. I find subs fun, but broken at the same time. It is a one trick pony. Just because you don't like it does not mean it won't be added to the game. It is a balance of interest. You speak to even out the equation. As i understand you have to be very careful when speaking out in China; however, this in particular is about a game. As long as you maintain your cool , you are free to debate the problem. Speaking out do relieve stress and frustration if that is the last thing it does. Forum goers are but a fraction of the playerbase. Usually are the most dedicated, but not the majority. I would really like to see where WG get the idea that sub would be popular however. If they EVER release that statistics that is.
  10. legionary2099

    25% debuff for selected Ops thoughts

    I think you should stop this attacking the person like sharks now. You either agree or disagree with his arguments. Also it might just have been a joke gone wrong. But then again, attacking him here do nothing good for the problem except making you feel better.
  11. legionary2099

    25% debuff for selected Ops thoughts

    I think you misunderstand my post and you have difficulty in understanding. Google this : I disagree with the proposed nerf and i don't like power leveling through Virtual machine. That's the intention. OK , now the normal bits : However , virtual machine and power leveling is a way to play. Power grinding exist in many games before this and chinese are famous for being grinders in MMO like World of Warcraft. I object to botting , but i do know that virtual machines are fine as long as there are guys playing using that virtual machine. Google STADIA is basically a massive virtual machine for gaming after all. Profiteering from power leveling ( such as selling account, services like grinding ships or Free EXP , ... etc) are strictly illegal. But that is NOT the case if you do it on your own account and do it yourself. In the past, i used to power playing MU too. I create alternate accounts and play it myself as a whole party. There is still a guy behind that party and i still account for it's action. But like i said, i don't sell it for real money, but use it for my own enjoyment. The second part : my clan usually do Operations when we don't have enough guys for CW. So we having fun is against the rule if the reward is decreased by 25%. That's not fair. Because a large part of WoWS , especially operation is teamwork. We SHOULD be rewarded better for teaming up, not less.
  12. legionary2099

    25% debuff for selected Ops thoughts

    This is dumb. So an assembled group of dudes cant have their fun together and help each other for better rewards. Anti competitive and anti social at its finest. I do not condone this method.
  13. legionary2099

    When will New Jersey come...

    We got loads of New Jerkys though, want some ?
  14. legionary2099

    Not Loading Into Game / AFK

    Asia Pacific Gateway internet cable line are under repair mode. Most net traffic have to be diverted, causing congestion in prime time. This is nothing new, currently the Pacific is in storm season. You can expect alot more instability, atleast until the storm season pass and repair party can get to those points and fix. You might think the cable is EXTRA THICC , but a cable is nothing compare to how strong the storm can get. It CAN send ship up side down and house flying.
  15. legionary2099

    Does WG forget about Missouri?

    Unlimited radar duration then ?
×