Epicurus_

Beta Tester
  • Content count

    313
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    5910

About Epicurus_

  • Rank
    Lieutenant Commander
  • Birthday
  • Portal profile Epicurus_

Recent Profile Visitors

184 profile views
  1. So all in all, we could do with some companionship.
  2. There's a mod that gives RDF skill without spending skill points?
  3. I'd recommend either Texas or Murmansk, you'd get the T5 regularly being thrown into T7 thanks to the current MM but you would already be experiencing that. I would suggest holding off getting anything any higher in tier until you've reached that tier higher tier games are a different beast.
  4. Honestly you need to provide a far more comprehensive list of disparity in skill levels than to show one battle every three or four days, until you do it does not illustrate a significant issue with skill disparity and does nothing to support your claim that there is a serious problem. If anything it supports what others have been telling you which is that there is not enough of a problem to require a change to CV match making. Please don't respond by saying you presented two examples in a 24hr period it's not good enough you need real evidence, hundreds of games within a 24hr period not one or two we could all list games where a CV player of less skill has been on the winning team regardless of whether they had any real impact on the game or not.
  5. Bismarck is a tech tree ship so as long as you have the ship researched you can purchase it again.
  6. I don't think the costs will change from the current economy if you don't join a clan but IMO it seems WG wants to encourage as many players to be in a clan as possible because when they launch clan wars they're going to want players participating in that. As far as clan battles go I expect it would be alot like WOT clan wars with territories to control on a map and clans will battle over control of these territories for rewards. With oil being a commodity in the game some territories will produce oil and others maybe produce doubloons, that's my guess.
  7. Didn't WG have this before with the black smoke or fire blocking view during drive-by's and going close to islands? I think it was more than a year ago now.
  8. Single eh?
  9. Well you don't know, you don't even seem to know that you can accumulate enough team damage in consecutive games to turn pink. As for proof you have no proof other than that you turned pink for causing team damage and you provide one screenshot for 10 points where you caused team damage. As if the fact that you show evidence that you did cause team damage exonerates you from doing team damage. Nice try.
  10. It doesn't matter if it's proof or opinion the fact is you turned pink and the game mechanics are flexible enough to allow for small amounts of team damage to occur without turning pink. There's a threshold i don't know how much team damage is required but if you stay below the threshold for team damage you don't turn pink.
  11. Well you did turn pink but then no one said you were a team killer just that you must've done considerable damage to team mates to turn pink.
  12. This is called an oxymoron. There are two teams in each battle and one must lose, this is the only certainty within the game.
  13. Then it's not free speech.