Jump to content

exter001

Member
  • Content Сount

    80
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    5307
  • Clan

    [UNRYU]

Community Reputation

27 Good

About exter001

  • Rank
    Lieutenant (junior grade)
  • Birthday 10/20/1992
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    ズイ₍₍(ง˘ω˘)ว⁾⁾ズイ

Recent Profile Visitors

338 profile views
  1. exter001

    Single player senario idea

    That would be hard. My friend have 1000+ games and he still doesn't understand that turning in towards torpedoes have higher chance of dodging the torpedo, not out. Even when I'm shouting at him in team speak.
  2. exter001

    CV haku AP bombs

    OP? , yes low skill?, no
  3. exter001

    [ichase] even he.........

    Do you know how to sarcasm?
  4. exter001

    [ichase] even he.........

    So because he have legitimate concerns/frustrations about being focused by CV which can happen to anybody (if the CV chose to), you call it BS? How do you know he's doing it for adsense money? What evidence do you have? I'm all for criticising CCs' opinion and voicing your opinion. But starting rumors and character assassination because you dislikes a person's opinion are disgusting.
  5. exter001

    [ichase] even he.........

    I haven't seen anyone able to counter iChase's point of "being focused by a CV sucks" though. Whether CV are OP or not (obviously not as OP as before), it sucks to be focused by a CV. Imo the previous CVs are way better in that, if you get focused. You just die, done. In this version, you'll also die (but in agony). As an example, I'm sure most of us here will choose being shot dead than being burn to death.
  6. exter001

    World of Warplanes

    Naw, you just have to somehow got on the wrong side of the enemy cv player. I've been focused by CVs because they have a hard on for DDs lol
  7. exter001

    Who are they? Where do they come from?

    Does this go under the name and shame rule thing? but yea, someone is too butthurt over accidental hits
  8. exter001

    Another teaser, IJN DD - NOT with 100 mm

    Here's a better picture
  9. exter001

    Regarding the "play poorly" report

    A GK with a tad bit too much hp?
  10. exter001

    Regarding the "play poorly" report

    no no, I'm having fun reading your conversation as well.
  11. I usually play destroyer, so my torp tube breaks every other game .
  12. No surface ship do not have unlimited firepower all the time, do you not remember damaged/destroyed turret?
  13. exter001

    Regarding the "play poorly" report

    That's why I said this and if WG still continues to use this confusing wording and I'm sure most players misunderstood this option, at least they can try to make it helpful in bringing the average skill up. You seems to be misunderstanding a lot of my intentions. I'm not denying anyone of service, if you don't want to watch it then you can close it after it pops up. It's not mandatory, just a suggestion.
  14. Why can't people accept that different people likes different stuff. It's just 2 characters in front man... Just 2.
  15. Currently the "play poorly" report is kind of a very useless report and in all seriousness vaguely termed. I doubt WG actually meant "play poorly" literally. Is there any plan to revamp said report? A suggestion is - a player is reported "play poorly" too often, the game will have a pop up suggesting (not forced) the player to a video guide (how it works, etc.) to actually get better at the game?
×